👉

Did you like how we did? Rate your experience!

Rated 4.5 out of 5 stars by our customers 561

Online solutions help you to manage your record administration along with raise the efficiency of the workflows. Stick to the fast guide to do VA 21-0788, steer clear of blunders along with furnish it in a timely manner:

How to complete any VA 21-0788 online:

  1. On the site with all the document, click on Begin immediately along with complete for the editor.
  2. Use your indications to submit established track record areas.
  3. Add your own info and speak to data.
  4. Make sure that you enter correct details and numbers throughout suitable areas.
  5. Very carefully confirm the content of the form as well as grammar along with punctuational.
  6. Navigate to Support area when you have questions or perhaps handle our Assistance team.
  7. Place an electronic digital unique in your VA 21-0788 by using Sign Device.
  8. After the form is fully gone, media Completed.
  9. Deliver the particular prepared document by way of electronic mail or facsimile, art print it out or perhaps reduce the gadget.

PDF editor permits you to help make changes to your VA 21-0788 from the internet connected gadget, personalize it based on your requirements, indicator this in electronic format and also disperse differently.

FAQ

Can a veteran buy a home using VA loan with bad credit?
You donu2019t specify what you consider u201cbad,u201d but the credit standards for VA loans are quite forgiving. Although VA doesnu2019t have a specified minimum for approval, most companies allow a FICO score as low as 580. The rate for someone with a 580 score will be about .625% higher than for someone with a 740 score.In order to have a score of 580, there must be some combination of the following reported on the credit report:Recent history (within 2 years) of late paymentsAccounts that are currently delinquent or in collectionPublic record items: liens, judgments, bankruptcy or foreclosureHigh or over-limit credit card balances. By u201chigh,u201d I mean significantly over 30% of the credit limit.Some of these items would have to be resolved before any lender will fund a loan. Collection accounts will have to be settled in some manner. Currently delinquent accounts will have to be brought current. Liens and judgments will have to be paid, although tax liens can subordinate to a new first mortgage without being paid off. The borrower would have to have an installment agreement with the taxing authority, however.Ironically, almost any of these necessary actions will raise the credit scoresu2014in some cases, dramatically.I hope this is helpfu.
Why should you use VA loan?
A VA-backed loan is one of the few mortgage products that allow the borrower full leverage -- that is, the ability to finance 100 percent of the purchase price (no money down). u00a0Especially in places where home prices are rising quickly, this can be a huge benefit. Trying to amass a downpayment of 5 or 10 percent as home prices are rising by 5 percent or more is a process of chasing ever-moving goal posts, but a no money down opportunity allows you to make a purchase now. u00a0While there is no mortgage insurance, you will be required to pay a loan funding fee; essentially, this is a one-time MI premium. The amount you are charged can vary, ranging from a low of 1.25 percent (with a 10 percent down payment) to as high as 3.3 percent of the loan amount. Factors influencing MI include: the loan size, down payment amount (if any), whether or not a borrower has had a previous VA loan, and the borroweru2019s military category. With the most common VA loan -- the no-money-down option -- the VA Funding Fee for regular military is 2.15 percent and the fee is 2.4 percent for those in the Reserves or National Guard.u00a0Another very valuable feature of VA-backed mortgages is that lenders do not use risk-based pricing. This means that even if your credit isn't all that high up the scale you won't see a higher interest rate or fees than someone who is closer to perfect. This is a considerable advantage when compared against conventional Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac-backed loans, where a FICO score of 620 means several percentage points in additional fees to obtain the same rate as a borrower with a FICO 740.u00a0If you can meet eligibility, a VA-backed loan can be a good way to purchase or refinance a home.
How can a veteran with bad credit get a home loan?
Credit Score is normally a secondary eligibility criteria for home loan. Other eligibility factors matter more. And these factors are as follows:Employment Stability: It is one of the important aspect to be taken into consideration by the lenders before providing home loan.Age Criteria: Generally the individuals in between the age group of 20u201360 years and are working professionals are more likely to get home loans easily by the banks or NBFCS. However for self-employed this will change to 24 to 65 years.Credit Rating: Since home loan is a secured loan, credit score below 750 is also acceptable by the lenders based upon your creditworthiness.Employer: The credibility for getting a home loan also enhances with type of profession or work you have opted or pursuing.Financial Situation: The lenders check your past, and present financial history.The Eligibility criteria are as follow:Source: FinBudHowever, you can apply for a home loan online with NBFCs, they follow the entire process online and offer quick disbursal of the loan amount.
Should the VA be merged into the Department of Defense to prmilitary members with recruitment-to-grave continuity of service?
Thatu2019s how it used to be done, and there was very good reason why the functions are now distinct and separate. I canu2019t think of a single efficiency that would be gained by going backwards.This isnu2019t me being a precious VA employee who wants to protect my old stomping grounds. This is me being a bureaucrat whou2019s seen the innards of the two largest bureaucracies in government - VA and DoD - and is telling you, in as direct a way as possible, why you do not want to combine those sausages.Letu2019s start from the beginning. Like, the beginning-beginning.Veteransu2022 compensation in the United States literally goes back to the Pilgrims. The Plymouth Colony determined in 1636 that those who were disabled in their fight with the Pequot Indians should receive regular compensation for their service.Flash forward 150 years, and Revolutionary War veteran Daniel Shays, angry that he was still owed compensation for his service (as were basically all veterans), took up arms against the Massachusetts government in a rebellion that literally shaped the nation as we know it today[1].The first Congress under the Constitution established a pension for veterans as one of its first acts, and so began the bureaucratic nightmare.The pension program (and its growth with various amendments) was run by the War Department until 1849, when it grew too large and was moved into the newly formed Department of the Interior.Any health care for veterans, meanwhile, remained principally a state responsibility until the end of the Civil War, when the influx of disabled veterans was too great for the patchwork of Soldiersu2022 Homes (some of which were Federal) to manage. In 1865, as the Civil War was coming to a close, the government formally established a network of facilities to prlong-term care for severely disabled veterans.Over time, Congress expanded the eligibility criteria for admission into these homes; and in so doing, they gradually transformed to being able to prhospital level care.Americau2019s entry into WWI had, perhaps, the longest repercussions for veteransu2022 care and benefits.The number of disabled veterans overwhelmed both military hospitals (where many were undergoing long-term recovery) and the Soldiersu2022 Homes network. In 1919, broad responsibility for veteransu2022 health care spun off to the Public Health Service and contracted private hospitals; and in 1921, Congress authorized the construction of hospitals specifically for veteransu2022 care.Also in 1921, Congress attempted to consolidate the various veteransu2022 programs under a single umbrella (the Veteransu2022 Bureau), but their efforts were incomplete. While the Veteransu2022 Bureau took on responsibility for insurance, outpatient care, and education benefits, the Bureau of Pensions (Department of Interior) still had responsibility for, um, pensions, and the National Homes for Disabled Volunteer Soldiers remained a separate entity.In 1930, Congress tried again, and so created the Veteransu2022 Administration to consolidate the Veteransu2022 Bureau, the Bureau of Pensions, and the National Homes.For the first time, the Federal government assumed, under a single organization, total health and compensation responsibility for veterans and their dependents.Between the influx of WWI veterans and the retirement of Spanish-American War veterans, spending on veteransu2022 services shot up through the 1920s. Moreover, Congress continued to expand eligibility requirements and levels of compensation. This led to a fateful decision in 1924 to authorize bonus payments to WWI veterans, payable beginning in 1944.When the Great Depression hit, many veterans found themselves out of work with the rest of the population. In the spirit of Daniel Shays almost 150 years before - but much, much less violently - veterans marched on Washington to demand that their compensation be cashed out so that they could support their families.Congress said, u201cNo,u201d and the Hoover Administration responded by sending in the military to disperse the encamped veterans and their families at bayonet point[2].So that was a great episode in American history (and in 1936, Congress relented and authorized early payment).But the trauma of the Bonus Army and the general experience of WWI veterans during the Great Depression spurred Congress to make significant reforms to veteransu2022 compensation and care leading up to and during WWII. This included wide expansion of education benefits, home loan assistance, and unemployment compensation.However, as with WWI, the rapid demobilization at the end of WWII caught VA under-prepared. By the end of 1947, it had doubled its staff to operate 126 hospitals and 721 offices to manage care and process claims. The Korean War further expanded VAu2019s operational capacity.To get ahead of the problems encountered with rapid demobilization of forces abroad (and, if youu2019re wondering, Iu2019m now starting to get to the crux of the question), VA in 1967 sent field officers to Vietnam to educate soon-to-separate servicemembers on their entitlements as veterans. This was the forerunner whatu2019s now codified as the Transition Assistance Program (TAP).What was then a loose affiliation between the Department of Defense and Veteransu2022 Administration is now a statutory, funded program that includes DoD, VA, the Departments of Labor and Homeland Security, and the Small Business Administration. Attending the program - which not only covers veteransu2022 benefits but includes financial literacy and general career advice - is mandatory for separating servicemembers.The VAu2019s on-the-ground assistance to returning Vietnam veterans made it clear that many of them would need long-term assistance readjusting to civilian life. This spawned the establishment of the Readjustment Counseling Service (ie, the Vet Center program) to prongoing services to combat veterans who may be having difficulty making the transition back to civilian life - and, uniquely, the services are run by counselors who themselves are combat veterans.But the influx of veterans from Vietnam put strains on a system that hadnu2019t seen significant investment in physical infrastructure since the end of WWII. VAu2019s medical budget tripled between 1967 and 1977, and its rehabilitation and education spending increased ten-fold.In 1977, the Veteransu2022 Administration commissioned the creation of an electronic health record that could be used across its hospitals, as veteransu2022 paper-based records were too prone to being lost or inadvertently destroyed[3][4]. This was Americau2019s first electronic health record, and for a long time the only one of its scale anywhere in the world. It was designed to have a core architecture that could be modded by individual hospitals to meet their own needs.It was so successful - and free to the public, having been created by the US government - that in 1988 the Department of Defense awarded a $1 billion contract (~$2.1 billion today) to copy the system for its own purposes, and make that copy totally proprietary.u2026Yes, you are reading that correctly. DoD paid $1 billion to take a perfectly functioning, free electronic health records system that was already US government property to make a private copy.Oh, and they managed to make it worse in the process[5].That created a decades long tech schism that defied both Congress and successive Presidents to resolve. Itu2019s even spawned its own, little bridge bureaucracy[6].So now, with DoD and VA having failed to get along (and even failing to make use of the Bridge Bureaucracy[7]), both Departmentsu2022 records systems are being put in the hands of a single, private provider[8] (and lots of other happy tech vendors[9]).Because in no way, shape, or form will entrusting the private sector to reform the largest electronic health records systems, arguably, in the world lead to any kind of cost overruns[10] or become an attractive target for neu2019er-do-wells[11].Nope.Anyway, how does all this support my position that merging DoD and VA is a bad idea to ensure continuity of care?A major takeaway from the experience of Vietnam veteransu2022 return to the US is, to be quite blunt, that the military gives very few shits about its people once theyu2019re no longer connected to military operations.The Department of Defense and the services have one overarching goal: combat readiness - to train and support war fighters. Once theyu2019re no longer in or supporting combat operations, then as far as Defense is concerned, youu2019re no longer their issue[12] .Going back to TAP, the law requires that DoD ensure that all servicemembers complete the course more than 90 days before they separate. This is because servicemembers often complained that, frequently, they werenu2019t made to take TAP courses until their very last two days in the service - the two days that their minds were very much elsewhere.However, despite both the legal requirement and the length of time afforded to separating servicemembers to complete the training, more than half of servicemembers donu2019t complete the training until their last 90 days, with DoD doing the baremost to monitor compliance[13] .And going back to the (ongoing) debacle of VA-DoD records inter-operability, a major issue was that VA didnu2019t have the political clout to go toe-to-toe with DoD on the issue.The Veterans Administration did not become the Cabinet-level, Department of Veteransu2022 Affairs until 1989[14] [15]. And while the previous Administrator position still required Senate confirmation, it didnu2019t share anywhere near the prestige (which, in Washington, equals power) as a Secretary appointment.If you were to fold the Department of Veteransu2022 Affairs into the Department of Defense, well, you canu2019t have co-Secretaries; and given that DoD has higher precedence than VA, VA would be bumped down the chain. You would be organizationally sending the message that veterans are less important than the active Armed Forces.And if there were ever a conflict between the Secretary of Defense and the now-Under Secretary of Veteransu2022 Affairs, the Under Secretary would basically be stuffed. They wouldnu2019t have direct access to the President or Congress to get their point of view across without being seen as undermining their boss.VA and DoD donu2019t need to be under the same umbrella to prlifetime continuity of care. They just need to be on the same page when it comes to collecting and sharing data on servicemembersu2022 health history (which they mostly are[16]), at which point the VA can take over and focus on long-term care while DoD concerns itself with readiness.And if the assumption is that having everyone in the same organization will break down silos and improve the flow of data, well, thatu2019s not grounded in the reality of the inner workings of Americau2019s largest bureaucracies[17] [18].Of all the possible ways I could think to reform VA and DoD to improve information sharing and continuity of services, merging the two Departments would be an act of desperation at the bottom of the list.Footnotes[1] Carter Moore's answer to What was Shays' Rebellion?[2] Carter Moore's answer to How disastrous to the US would it be if all war veterans benefits got slashed to zero?[3] The 1973 Fire, National Personnel Records Center[4] A 40-year 'conspiracy' at the VA[5] AHLTA users sound off about military EHR system[6] VA Information Technology[7] EHR interoperability for VA and DoD, whou2019s responsible? Lawmakers, officials can't agree[8] VA picks Cerner to replace VistA; Trump says EHR will fix agency's data sharing 'once and for all'[9] Cerner reveals long list of VA EHR modernization partners[10] DoD raises budget on Leidos contract for Cerner EHR project by $1.2 billion[11] U.S. data breaches and exposed records 2022 | Statistic[12] 126,000 service members in crosshairs for separation as DoDu2019s u2018deploy or get outu2022 policy takes effect[13] Transitioning Veterans: DOD Needs to Improve Performance Reporting and Monitoring for the Transition Assistance Program[14] Reagan Would Elevate V.A. to Cabinet Level[15] Reagan signs bill creating veterans department[16] https://www.health.mil/Military-...[17] https://www.realcleardefense.com...[18] After A Year Of Turmoil, New VA Secretary Says 'Waters Are Calmer'
Why should the US have a single payer system when Veteran Affairs single payer is broken?
Totally false premise (that the VA is u201cbrokenu201d). The VA is NOT broken u2022 but it is seriously handicapped financially. In fact, I would argue that VA has been intentionally crippled (through the years) to support the argument (by many) that u201csingle-payeru201d healthcare in the U.S. canu2019t work.How can I make such a bold u2022 counter-intuitive claim? Itu2019s in the very nature and history of the VA itself u2022 which has always been a financial football at the very center of our national politics.At the time of the latest scandal u2022 the Phoenix facility in 2022 u2022 CNN did a timeline of the VA that should be required reading. It starts in 1921 with the Veterans Bureau which was formed by our government to aid World War I vets.It quickly devolves into corruption, and is abolished nine years later under a cloud of scandal. [1]The corruption and scandals never stopped because they all revolve around the same issue u2022 money.But, before we can talk about HOW money impacts the VA directly, we have to talk about the U.S. healthcare system generally.Unlike every other industrialized country, the U.S. system is based on u201ctieredu201d health coverage.The U.S. tiers health coverage by:Employment (Employer Sponsored Insurance or ESI)Age (twice u2022 26 & 65/Medicare)Income (Medicaid)Military Service (VA)Heritage (Indian Health Services)u2022 and we still wind up with about 30 million Americans who have no health insurance coverage at all (the u201cuninsuredu201d). This doesnu2019t mean that the uninsured have no healthcare needs u2022 it just means that those expenses are u201ccost-shiftedu201d to all of us that do pay (one way or another) for our coverage.Now, thereu2019s only one reason for tiering health coverage this way u2022 and thatu2019s to support tiered pricing. Americans are used to tiered pricing in almost every other aspect of their consumer life (hotels, airlines, appliances, homes, cars, technology), so many donu2019t blink an eye when tiered pricing is applied to healthcare (even though they rarely see the actual pricing). Many simply assume that healthcare pricing is tiered u2022 and that it is ok. It isnu2019t.From that list above, tiered pricing is highest to lowest. In other words, commercial rates applied to ESI are the highest/best available to doctors and hospitals for their services. ESI is where they make the most money because itu2019s whatever the market will bear. Medicare and Medicaid are fixed/lower rates (in fact, many doctors simply donu2019t take Medicaid patients at all because the rates are so low).#4 is VA u2022 which is about on par with Medicaid rates u2022 except itu2019s even worse because unlike Medicare or Medicaid, the hospitals are Government owned (and doctors are basically Government employees). As a VA doc (unlike say a Medicare or Medicaid doc), you have no access to the lucrative/commercial tier. As a doc, youru2019e income is stuck at whatever the VA pays. Sure, you *could* moonlight (and some VA docs do), but youu2019re also trying to have a life after 10 years of med school u2022 right?In this sense, the VA is like the NHS in the U.K. (also single-payer and government owned) u2022 except that the VA rates paid to doctors are well below market compared to any other coverage tier.As highly trained professionals, doctors (all doctors) have to make economic decisions about their income and their future. That future includes having to recognize the loss of about 10 years of earning power (through med school) and assuming (on average) about $180,000 in student debt.Given these economic variables, there is a longstanding and chronic shortage of doctors willing to work at/for the VA. Itu2019s literally that simple. The VA is seriously underfunded for a caliber of professional (doctors) thatu2019s already in short supply u2022 and has no way to compete for that talent without changing the pay scale.Our Government COULD change this u2022 by raising pay rates to docs u2022 but it doesnu2019t! Thatu2019s not the fault of u201csingle-payeru201d healthcare, but it is most definitely the the fault of our system of tiered coverage u2022 which is heavily tilted against doctors choosing to work for the VA.IF I had to draw a retail analogy, it would be like an MIT grad u2022 who got an MBA at Harvard u2022 and then deciding to go to work for the Department of Motor Vehicles. Why would anyone do that? They wouldnu2019t u2022 and thatu2019s the challenge the VA is stuck with. The problem is the rate of pay u2022 not the source of payment!Footnote: As referenced above, the VA is like the U.K.u2019s NHS in that it is both a single-payer system AND government owned, BUT, government ownership isnu2019t a requirement to be a single-payer system. In fact, most single-payer models around the world arenu2019t government owned u2022 and again u2022 source of payment isnu2019t the issue. The issue is the pay scale.'Single-Payer' Healthcare Isn't Necessary - But Single Pricing Is[1] The VA's troubled history
If you believe that this page should be taken down, please follow our DMCA take down process here.